What are Newton’s
Laws of Thermodynamics? This is what I was asked at a recent social gathering,
after my profession had been forced out of me. Not that I am generally unwilling
to talk about what I do to make ends meet, but this was past midnight on a
Saturday around the poker table when I was just beginning to get into my element. I felt disinclined to answer the question as it seemed to purely be a sledging
tactic, just to get ahead in the game, rather than a genuine
interest in my knowledge repertoire. Nevertheless, I might have
plain-and-simple answered it had I known what the Newton’s Laws of
Thermodynamics were. I felt I was in Russell Peters kind of situation, where he
had been bullied into admitting buying a jar of family jewels from Costco. This
is what followed:
‘Umm… Newton had
nothing to do with the Laws of Thermodynamics’
‘Ok. What then is the
first law of thermodynamics?’
I look around the
table to see if anyone comes to my rescue. Not a chance. Oh well… for what it
is worth…
‘The first law of
thermodynamics is that the change in internal energy of a system equals to…’
‘What is the second
law of thermodynamics?’
‘What?’
‘Tell me. What is the
second law of thermodynamics?’
‘But I haven’t even
finished what the first…’
‘It is me. I am the
second law of thermodynamics. This is how I feel’
I think, “That does
not make sense, logically to say the very least. But if you mean your entropy
is increasing, I see that”.
But I say, ‘Good for
you. Can we play now?’
That was that. We moved
on to other things. I actually commend the person for stringing Newton, laws
and thermodynamics in the same sentence, not only given the state of his
inebriation, but also given his background. As far away from mine as it could
be without him having to be a cobbler, a cricketer or an entertainer. All this banter
reminded me of my high school Physics teacher and his innovative way of
teaching the kids Newton’s laws of motion. A definite way to get through to the
mind of kids. As this was a long time ago I don’t remember it verbatim,
but the lesson is not forgotten. I paraphrase his words:
Newton’s first law of
motion: People will keep talking unless acted upon by an external force, i.e.,
the palm of my hand on their faces.
Newton’s second law
of motion: The force of my slap on your face will be equal to product of the
mass of my hand and the acceleration with which it hits you.
Newton’s third law of
motion: Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. For e.g. If I talk you
will shut up and listen. On the other hand if you talk, I will make you shut up
and listen.
Newton himself could
not have put it better. And I may have been one of the very few in this world
who learned both the theory and had a personal demonstration of Newton’s laws
of motion. No wonder it is hard to forget.
BTW, are you are dying to know? I lost the poker game.
6 comments:
That guy sounds like a tool! Must be a physician and thinks he is a physicist!
On a different note, I will remind myself to demonstrate the Newton's laws to you to remind you of other theories as well!
I really did not see any correlation between Newton's 3rd law and this statement -- "If I talk you will shut up and listen. On the other hand if you talk, I will make you shut up and listen."
!!????!!!
As I was reading the post, I am thinking to myself - My memory sucks! "Newton's laws of thermodynamics" Why can't I remember any? Thanks for not confusing my already confused brain cells.
Smitten: Haan ji! espelling mishtake hain ji us bande ke dimaag mein.
I think you already use the demonstration technique quite well. No need for further inspiration!
Ash: It does not sound fair, but that was his interpretation of opposite and equal reaction! To us scared kids, it made perfect sense.
Anon: At least you weren't called out in front of a bunch of people. It took a few moments for my brain cells to comprehend that and I was wondering, is this a trick question somehow?
Awesome read...had me in splits!! At least this guy was drunk...there are people out there who ask the weirdest of questions and expect you to know the answers....
Anon#2: Thank you! :-) I think he would have been the same sans the drinking.
Post a Comment